Thursday, April 21, 2022

Michael Carneal up for parole

 "I was feeling proud, strong, good, and more respected. I had accomplished something. I'm not the kind of kid who accomplishes anything. This is the only adventure I've ever had." ~Michael Carneal, age 14.


On December 1, 1997, 14-year-old Michael Carneal opened fire in his school, shooting and killing  Nicole Hadley, Kayce Steger, and Jessica James. Five other students were injured; Missy Jenkins was left paralyzed from the waist down. 

He carried his weapon into school covered in a blanket, calling it "an art project." He also had several other weapons in his backpack. His sister drove him to school, unaware of how armed he was and what he was about to do to his classmates. So that he wouldn't be bothered by the nose, he inserted earplugs into his own ears before he began shooting.

For his shocking crime, Carneal was sentence to life in prison with a chance of parole after 25 years. A decision will be made on parole later this fall.

If anyone would like to write a letter against the parole of Michael Carneal, you can do so by writing:

Kentucky Parole Board

P.O. Box 2400 

Frankfort, KY 40602

Letters must be received by July 31, 2022.

More info: A Notorious School Mass Murderer Could Be Released from Prison in Seven Months

Please consider using the share buttons to share this content!

Content copyright © J Clark 2022. Please seek permission to use material from this blog.

Wednesday, April 20, 2022

Metal Detectors in Schools, Part 2

 

Some of my files on metal detectors in schools...
I was asked, after my previous post on metal detectors in schools, if I could condense my post into a shorter post with the points summed up. I do have a streamlined, 10-point piece that will be in my book (this is not the finished version) that I will post here. Remember, I am not for or against metal detectors--there is much to consider before going that route. There have been schools that installed metal detectors before realizing what a disruption it was, every day, and to keep enough trained people manning the detectors. Informed decisions, with feedback from the students, parents, and staff, should take place. We should remember, too, that there is already a lot of metal inside of schools that could be turned into a weapon--chair legs, desks, and so on. Metal detectors won't detect glass, or drugs like Fentanyl that are making their way into more and more schools. Metal detectors won't deter sexual assaults or brawls. So, here is my piece.


Ten things to consider before installing metal detectors:

1. If using metal detectors in schools with first floor windows, it may be required for windows to be permanently sealed--otherwise, a gun can be (and has been) passed to someone inside the school. Sealing off windows could be a fire hazard in the event of fire and people need to use the windows to evacuate. Ask the metal detection company about this requirement and whatever other permanent fixes would need to take place. Check with the local Fire Marshal to see if it would be a Code violation.

2. Weapons can be brought into the school during times a school is in use for PTA, back to school night, sports events, etc., and can be hidden for use later when school is in session. People are in and out of schools all the time; some students leave for lunch, appointments, and various other reasons, and then return. Custodians, teachers, admin, delivery people are also in and out of schools. Would there be personnel available all day to put them through the detectors?

3. It takes 3-5 trained people to man the detectors--will this many people be available?

4. Those manning the detectors will be in harm's way--in at least one school shooting, the security guard and a teacher at the detectors were the first to be killed.

5. Students have been known to go through the detectors and then go prop or hold open doors for armed students to enter.

6. More school shootings are happening outdoors--during lunch, arrival, and dismissal. Guns have been passed to students through fences. Some students have hidden weapons outdoors on school property to retrieve later.

7. Will the school install and use the detectors as required by the manufacturer, and the local fire codes? Improper use and installation can void the warranty--the company couldn't be sued if a weapon gets through and a tragedy occurs if the proper procedures were not adhered to. Will they be used every day or once in a while? Will enough trained personnel be available for screenings?

8. Students lined up to go through the detectors would not only take a lot more time (arriving at school earlier would cause those who already catch their bus at 6:30 in the morning to have to be at bus stops even earlier, and bus drivers to have to start earlier). In schools with 2000+ students, this will take a lot of time.

9. If metal detectors are mandated (as one Virginia lawmaker wants to do), who will pay for the detectors, sealing first floor windows, and the persons to man the detectors? 

10. Lining students up to go through the detectors would make them  sitting ducks for the rampage shooter who is interested in a high body count--with hundreds/thousands of students in one place, a shooter could kill an untold numbers of students.

Please consider using the share buttons to share this content!

Content copyright © J Clark 2022. Please seek permission to use material from this blog.

Monday, April 18, 2022

Metal detectors in schools


"Should metal detectors be used in schools?"  is a topic I am asked about frequently. I am neither for or against metal detectors. What I am for is for parents, students, staff, etc. to be informed of all that is involved. This is just a blog post; more info will be in my book, so I'm not going to write a book-length post here. I will refer to experts, and incidents from news articles.

Some metal detector companies require all lower floor windows to be sealed. If doors are left propped open, and a tragedy happens, it could void the warranty. Ignoring basic safety protocols and polices can also void the warranty--so it is important to know what you're paying for, and what will be required of those operating metal detectors and any weapons detecting systems. 

What if these windows had been sealed?


Who remembers "the boy in the window"? Patrick Ireland likely would not have survived the Columbine massacre if he could not have gotten himself out through a window, even though he was severely injured.

The Boy in the Window



May 24, 2022--Uvalde, Texas: A metal detector wouldn't have helped here because at least one back door was unlocked, reportedly open...

"Finally, police approached from outside the classroom and broke the windows. The teacher called for her students to line up. Quickly but orderly. Just like they do every day for lunch and recess.

One by one, the teacher held their hands and helped each of her students out the window."

Uvalde Texas

"Daniel later climbed out of a broken window to escape, cutting his hand on some glass, he said"

A 9-year-old describes escaping through a window during the Uvalde school massacre

"All you hear is shots go off, and my teacher ran to the door," the student said. "He looked out the door and he just tells everybody to jump out the window and tried to take cover behind his desk, and we just jumped out his window."  Erie High School shooting suspect turns himself into police

"students can smuggle items through entrances or windows not staffed with detectors, or others who have passed through can be handed items from those who have not via windows or other openings. Several high-profile cases have illustrated these inadequacies in search policies. In some locations, the detectors are not even operational."  Metal detectors and school violence


This is probably one of the best articles out there on metal detectors in schools--how they fail, how students get weapons inside of schools:

"Some teenage boys say they use girls as couriers, smuggling in weapons on female students, who aren't supposed to be patted down by male security guards. Groups of students wait until just before the school day begins, when the guards are more eager to rush them through to get them to class on time." MEASURES TO MAKE D.C. SCHOOLS SAFER FALL FATALLY SHORT


"In fact, a report shows the student said he was “allowed by school administration” to go in through a back door of the school where there is no security checkpoint. Special education students get dropped off at that back door." How East Tech student brought assault rifle into school


"In a statement, Greenville County School District said all of its schools have metal wands, but not permanent fixed metal detectors because they are not 100 percent effective at keeping weapons out of school and create a false sense of security. The Post and Courier also interviewed multiple school safety authorities who said that metal detectors were not an effective way to keep guns out of schools."  10 days of mourning and resilience: Inside Tanglewood’s deadly school shooting

"Metal detectors? Too easy to bypass, too expensive and too disruptive. One logical step to address the issue would be to keep guns off campuses, and a common method to attempt that is by installing metal detectors, which are often employed by some of the bigger school districts.

“There’s a number of ways they can be bypassed,’’ Dorn said. “Every school I work with that uses them mentions to me, ‘Oh, we see students do X, Y and Z to get around metal detectors.’ It’s very expensive to do it correctly, and it’s limited to specific environments.’’

Guy Russ, head of armed-intruder prevention at Church Mutual Insurance, puts it in starker terms: “The thing to realize is it could mean that the person manning the metal detector is the first one to get shot,’’ he said." How to keep schools safe? We're focusing our time, energy and money on 'all the wrong things,' experts say

"The student walked through a metal detector while armed with a handgun, according to administrators. When the gun was fired, school officials said the student was alone, and no one was hurt."


"School officials said the student was taken into custody, and now they are looking into how that student got through the working metal detectors without being stopped."

"It was the main entrance the student went through, yes," said Stout. "Everything is working properly."

"The district said since installing metal detectors at middle and high schools across the district, this is the second instance of a weapon somehow getting through."

Putnam City student who fired gun entered school through metal detector


“I do not believe metal detectors are the answer as a rule for day-to-day school work. For entry into a basketball game or a football game, perhaps. For day-to-day school operations, no. … There are hundreds of windows on the ground floor. There are dozens and dozens of doors on the ground floor through which things, weapons, could be slipped.” It’s time to revisit metal detectors in schools

"Metal detectors may also have an undesirable impact on school operations. As anyone who has flown in or out of a major airport can testify, the requirement to walk through a metal detector can create major traffic jams during peak times. Schools using metal detection at campus entrances may need to stagger start times for the first period. Students lined up outside the main doors could present a fire hazard. Additionally, while students are waiting to get inside, there is an inherent danger in that they are left vulnerable to threats outside the building"  Metal Detectors in Schools

"Ken Trump, president of Cleveland-based National School Safety and Security Services, believes metal detectors are an unsustainable, knee-jerk political reaction. He cautions against their use for practical reasons like cost, and because they are often seen as a replacement for better strategies."

"A middle school where a 14-year-old boy was shot and wounded in the neck by a fellow student had metal detectors, and school officials were investigating how the shooter made it past them.

"The obvious question is: How did this get past a metal detector?" he asked, referring to the gun. "That's something we do not know yet." Atlanta schools chief unsure how middle school shooter got past metal detector

"Investigators have learned the armed student brought the gun into the building through a side door opened by accomplices. The accomplices will be disciplined, Canfora said."  Student sneaks gun past metal detectors into Cleveland high school, tries to sell weapon in bathroom

"Will all ground-level windows be permanently secured at all times so no one can pass a weapon through an open window to someone who already passed metal detector screening and is in the building?  Would doing so even be allowed by local fire marshals?"  Metal Detectors and School Safety

"Witnesses said the eighth-graders had argued before the shootings at Carter G. Woodson Middle School, where students must pass through a metal detector to enter. The younger boy got the gun from outside the chain-link fence and shot the 15-year-old, only to have the older boy grab the gun and shoot him, police Lt. Marlon Defillo said."   2 Hurt in New Orleans School Shooting


And all of those links are just for starters. We have to remember that some school shooters want a high body count; some want to beat the number of students killed at Columbine. Imagine hundreds to thousands of students lined up to get into school--they would be sitting ducks for a drive-by shooter to take out an untold number of students.

Some school shooters also attempt or have considered using bombs, Molotov cocktails, or other explosives. In a school with metal detectors that require all lower level windows to be permanently sealed, those windows could not be used as emergency exits. Think of being in a classroom and an explosive goes off outside in the hallway, or another classroom, and windows are the only exits. Then what?

What do students feel about the use of metal detectors? Most of what I have read, the students are not for them. Before a decision is made about the use of metal detectors in schools, the students need to give their input--their voice should be listened to. I am reminded of this piece:

"This week, several members of Congress complained about the hardening of the Capitol after last week’s violent insurrection. They complained that the metal detectors created chaos and lines, infringed on their liberties, and were a diversion of valuable resources. These are the same complaints that advocates have been making about the hardening of school buildings for years.

Immediately after this news spread, I thought about a 12-year-old girl in Washington, DC — just blocks from the very same Capitol on which insurgents laid siege — who told me that she begins her day flanked by law enforcement officers, standing in line waiting to go through a metal detector. She’s only in middle school, and yet this Black child is made to feel like a criminal walking through the school doors. She was also acutely aware that this was both a waste of time and a waste of resources. She is right."   It’s Time to Consider Removing Metal Detectors from Schools Now

And this one:

“From the moment we stepped through the doors in the morning, we were faced with metal detectors, X-ray machines, and uniformed security,” said Ward, describing a high-poverty, majority-black campus “where many young people … feel unwelcome and under siege.” When School Feels Like Prison


At school events such as PTA meetings, back to school night, sports or music concerts, metal detector use is suspended due to the sheer number of people coming and going. It would be easy for someone to hide weapons inside the school to retrieve at a later date after going through a metal detector.

What about during thunderstorms, snowstorms, and other inclement weather? Math problem: It takes 10-15 seconds to go through a metal detector (if nothing sets it off). How many minutes/hours does it take to process 1000/2000/ or more students?

Who will be trained to man the detectors? Those persons should be very well trained and have their life insurance premiums paid up because they may be the first one killed if a shooter is determined enough.

Then there are ways for kids to get weapons past the detectors. In the early morning rush when students need to get to class on time, if a detector goes off the student may say "Oh, it must've been my belt buckle!" and keep going. Kids get all manner of items into school--one said she gets her cellphone into school (they are banned for students at her school)--by putting it inside her umbrella, and the umbrella sets of the detector. Instrument cases are rarely, if ever, checked. "Oh, it's just my sax/clarinet/guitar/etc.!" Guns have been taken to school in instrument cases.

I recently heard that backpacks don't go through metal detectors in some schools because the zippers are metal and would set them off and it would take too long to check them all...so all a shooter would have to do is keep the weapon in his/her backpack...

I believe that the use of metal detectors is something that should be researched thoroughly and all of the pros and cons considered. It should be up to individual schools, or districts (along with parents and students), to decide this. It should definitely not be mandatory, across the board, for every school! It should be a thoughtful, well planned decision, not a knee-jerk, emotional reaction.

But all the drills, lockdown practices, and Run Hide Fight is useless when negligently leaving backdoors unlocked and unattended allows shooters to enter. No one teaches kids/teachers what to do when schools negligently leave their doors unlocked and a gunman barricades himself in their classroom and there is nowhere to run, hide, or fight.


Please consider using the share buttons to share this content!

Content copyright © J Clark 2022. Please seek permission to use material from this blog.

Saturday, April 9, 2022

A book in the works...

 At times I hear "You should write a book!" But there are dozens of books out there already that few seem interested in picking up to read. I go back and forth--no, not gonna do it. Maybe I will. Maybe I won't.

After researching school shootings for over two decades and having amassed so much material, I figure I might as well. At least I'll get it out of my system and then turn my attention elsewhere. And I'll likely donate the materials to a school or a parent group, if we can get enough interest in starting one locally, once I'm done with the book. 

I do feel I have a slant that I don't often see in the book that I'm writing, and that is what past school shootings and school shooters can teach us to help prevent future school shootings. Things schools, community, parents, everyone, really, can do. And best of all, many of the important things are low cost/no cost!

I hear a lot of calls for metal detectors. That's usually a knee jerk reaction after a school shooting but people generally fail to think it through, so I'll have a lot on that in the book, and will share some info on this blog as well. 

One thing I've read that in order to not void the warranty on school metal detectors, the entire first floor windows of the school need to be permanently sealed. That may be against Fire Code regulations so that would be something to discuss with the local Fire Marshal. Speaking of fire--in the event of a fire and no windows are available to use as an exit, that could be a disaster.

There was a gun incident in Erie, Pennsylvania recently and I took note of this in an article:

"All you hear is shots go off, and my teacher ran to the door," the student said. "He looked out the door and he just tells everybody to jump out the window and tried to take cover behind his desk, and we just jumped out his window."

If those windows had been sealed, how would the students have escaped?

That's just for starters; there is a lot to be thought about and discussed between schools, parents, law enforcement, and fire officials. I am neither for or against metal detectors. I am, however, for informed parents, students, and staff. Know what is involved.

Content copyright © J Clark 2022. Please seek permission to use material from this blog.

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Long time, no see...

It has been some time now--almost 3 years!--since I posted to this blog. For one thing, research takes a lot of time, and time has been in short supply since my husband retired in 2017. In 2019 he had his second brain surgery so there was no writing for most of year while I looked after him. I had an appendectomy in November 2020 and Lyme disease in 2021, which I am still recovering from. So, very little research and writing has taken place until relatively recently.

I am working on a book about school shootings and the lessons learned that should have been learned. It will be different from what is currently out there as there is no need to reinvent the wheel. If there are certain books on topics people are interested in, I can recommend some. I love to share what is available, I am not a know it all by any stretch--I learn more every day. 

I do get some questions over and over that I will try to address if they are within the scope of my book--others with far more knowledge than me in certain areas have already written about their expertise and I suggest others take advantage of their work. I will not take a political side. I will not slant the facts to demonize one side or another. I will not write a screed on guns--there are other books and activist groups who are doing that. I can't cover everything; no one book, article, or study can.

I will try to post once or twice a month but that depends on time available. The first post will be about metal detectors in schools and will be up in the near future.


Content copyright © J Clark 2022. Please seek permission to use material from this blog.

Sunday, August 25, 2019

August 25, 2019

SOME of the dozens of books I use in my research...
Well, this isn't the post that I had planned for today, but it is a necessary one...

I have been researching school shootings and related issues for over 20 years. In that time, I have purchased dozens of books, proprietary research studies, paid for newspaper article access for articles behind a paywall. I have bought more ink and computer paper than I want to think about, as well as numerous other supplies.

I have spent countless hours over 20+ years doing this research, talking to experts such as Dr. Dewey Cornell, Lt Col Dave Grossman, Dr. Peter Langman, Dr. Stanton E. Samenow, and many others. If I have a question then I go to someone who would know; in most cases that is a primary source of information rather than second, third, or fourth-hand information. That takes research to know who to ask, and time to write to these experts.
All of these books purchased was self-funded

In other words--I've put in the time and the finances to get the knowledge that I have today. So it royally pisses me straight off when someone uses my identical words to post as their own with no attribution (and I called them out publicly for doing it). I don't do that to others. Yet I have had that happen 3 times this month alone. I work hard and don't mind sharing what I have learned. But to copy someone else's work, word for word, and use it as their own, is disingenuous. It also causes the person who shares their knowledge to no long want to share their work until they have been published and copyright infringement is easier to deal with. That hurts everyone--knowledge that could help is now being protected until some future time. And for those stealing plagiarizing someone else's work--how do you know that what I wrote is correct? What if I got it wrong? Don't you want to know for sure?

SOME of my research files. All of this takes time, and
funds for paper, ink, folders, etc. 
My research is acknowledged in the Rosemond
book Raising a Nonviolent Child.
I know some will say that I am just worried about profit. If that was the case, I wouldn't spend so much of my own money on this research. My son is grown, I don't have to do this. But someone with over 20 years of study is bound to see the big picture and have some insights to offer...which will now be less forthcoming from myself. I have made no money in this endeavor. There are easier and less costly--in terms of funds and time--to make a profit.

It isn't right to steal material property from other people and it is not right to steal intellectual property from other people. I will call it out when I see it. It doesn't matter if it is on social media, it is still stealing to take others' work and use it as your own. Do your own work. Put in the hours and funds yourself. And when you do take and use someone else's work as your own--you run the risk of it being in error.

Do your due diligence, do the heavy lifting, and always ask permission to share someone else's work. It's the right thing to do.

Content copyright © J Clark 2019. Please seek permission to use material from this blog.

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Making school threats in the Commonwealth of Virginia

Making a threat against a school or persons is a crime in the Commonwealth of Virginia; it would be good for parents and school personnel to look up the laws in their states, and make certain that their children and the students in their school know what the consequences could be; again, because school threats are no joke!

A portion of the Virginia law; more info at the link.

"2. Any person who communicates a threat, in a writing, including an electronically transmitted communication producing a visual or electronic message, to kill or do bodily harm, (i) on the grounds or premises of any elementary, middle or secondary school property, (ii) at any elementary, middle or secondary school-sponsored event or (iii) on a school bus to any person or persons, regardless of whether the person who is the object of the threat actually receives the threat, and the threat would place the person who is the object of the threat in reasonable apprehension of death or bodily harm, is guilty of a Class 6 felony."

Code of Virginia


Please consider using the share buttons to share this content!

Content copyright © J Clark 2019. Please seek permission to use material from this blog.